Linear (edge) resection
PrincipleLinear excision of the free edge
Best indicationModerate hypertrophy, pigmented free edge to remove
AdvantagesSimple technique, short learning curve
LimitationsLong scar, loss of natural free edge


Reduction labiaplasty: a precise procedure that respects the anatomy. Performed as day-case surgery, with possible French health insurance reimbursement.

Consultations at the practice, 241 rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré (Paris 8th), and at Clinique Hartmann (Neuilly-sur-Seine). Surgery takes place at Clinique Hartmann.
If you’re reading this page, something has probably been bothering you for a while. Maybe for a long time. Maybe you’ve never spoken about it openly — not to your doctor, not to your loved ones. It’s common. It’s understandable.
Discomfort related to the labia minora affects women of all ages and all body types. It can appear at puberty, after childbirth, or gradually without any identifiable cause. It is not a sign of abnormality. It says nothing about your femininity.
What matters is the impact on your daily life. Is it preventing you from doing sport freely? Is it weighing on your intimate life? Are you avoiding certain situations because of it? If the answer is yes to any of these questions, a consultation may be worth considering.
The consultation does not commit you to anything. Its first purpose is to listen to you, examine you, and provide an honest answer — whether surgical or not.
Anatomical diversity is the rule, not the exception. Surgery is not there to conform to a norm — it is there to relieve real discomfort.
Published anatomical studies show extreme variability of the labia minora in healthy adult women: length from 20 mm to over 100 mm, width from 7 to 50 mm, right-left asymmetry in more than 50% of cases. None of these morphologies is pathological in itself.
The Motakef classification (2015), used in clinical practice, does not aim to define an aesthetic norm. It serves only to grade the degree of protrusion beyond the labia majora to guide surgical indications and reimbursement criteria. A stage II is not "abnormal" — it is simply a clinical reference point.
The best published satisfaction studies on labiaplasty (Miklos & Moore, 2013; Motakef, 2015; Goodman, 2016) show patient satisfaction rates above 95% — provided the indication is correctly established and the patient is properly informed beforehand.
This is why the pre-operative consultation is not a formality. It is the most important moment of the pathway.
The decision to consult belongs entirely to the patient. It may be motivated by functional discomfort in daily life, psychological unease, or both. All these reasons are legitimate and deserve attentive, non-judgemental listening.

Two techniques are available according to the official CNGOF/SCGP 2024 information sheet. The choice depends on your anatomy and surgical practice — we discuss it together during the consultation.

Longitudinal resection involves directly resecting the excess portion of the labia minora protruding beyond the labia majora. This is the CNGOF/SCGP reference technique — simple and reproducible. It produces a regular result but may slightly alter the natural pigmentation of the labial edge. It is particularly indicated when the free edge is irregular or hyperpigmented.
Sutures are performed with absorbable threads that will fall away spontaneously in the weeks following surgery — no removal necessary.
Wedge resection treats both an excess of length and height of the labia minora. A triangle of mucosa is drawn, excised, and the labium is then reconstructed. This technique preserves the original free edge and the natural pigmentation of the mucosa. It is technically more demanding and requires precise planning of the incision.
The risk of partial dehiscence is slightly higher in cases of post-operative haematoma. It is preferred when the patient wishes a very natural result, with an intact free edge.
The procedure is performed under general anaesthesia, as day surgery, at the Groupe Hospitalier Hartmann in Neuilly-sur-Seine. It lasts approximately 20 minutes. The patient arrives in the morning and returns home in the afternoon, accompanied.
A pre-operative anaesthetic consultation is mandatory. Standard blood tests are prescribed. No particular dietary restrictions beyond standard fasting before general anaesthesia.
Consultations at the practice, 241 rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré (Paris 8th), and at Clinique Hartmann (Neuilly-sur-Seine). Surgery takes place at Clinique Hartmann.
Recovery is generally straightforward. Swelling and a pulling sensation are expected in the first week — well attenuated by simple analgesics. The definitive result can be assessed from 2 months, scars at 12 months.

The recommendations of the official CNGOF/SCGP 2024 information sheet are as follows. In the first 15 days: loose clothing or skirts, cotton underwear. It is very important to avoid any maceration — dry carefully after showering and after each urination.
It is recommended to avoid all sexual intercourse, tampon use, baths, aquatic activities and any strenuous physical activity until the post-operative consultation at one month. Ice can be applied locally to reduce swelling in the first few days.
Loose clothing · cotton underwear for 15 days No baths · no tampons · no sport before month 1 Careful drying after each urinationDuring the procedure: bleeding or haematoma formation is possible. Very rarely, compression injuries to nerves or soft tissues may occur.
After the procedure: the principal risk is wound dehiscence, which usually follows a haematoma. It is most often managed with local care, sometimes antibiotics, and only very rarely requires surgical revision. Local pulling sensations are common and well controlled with simple analgesics. Bruising may appear and resolves spontaneously.
Long-term: skin or mucosal necrosis is rare and generally limited. Painful intercourse is exceptional and transient. Altered sensitivity of the labia minora is very rare, usually transient, and recovers within 3 to 6 months.
Wound dehiscence — main risk Altered sensitivity — very rare, transient Mucosal necrosis — rare, local careAfter surgery, contact the surgical team without delay if you notice any of the following: persistent heavy bleeding, foul-smelling discharge, unusual pain or fever. These signs may indicate a haematoma, infection or wound dehiscence requiring prompt management.
If in doubt, it is always better to call. Early management prevents more serious complications in the vast majority of cases.
Heavy bleeding → call Fever · foul-smelling discharge → seek review Unusual pain → do not waitSix clear steps, no surprises. Each patient is accompanied individually from the initial consultation to the final result.

Labiaplasty is listed in the surgical procedure nomenclature and reimbursed by French National Health Insurance. A detailed quote is systematically provided during the consultation, and I show you photographs of results so you know exactly what to expect.

Labiaplasty is a procedure listed in the CCAM nomenclature under the code JMMA005. It is reimbursed by French National Health Insurance, with a coverage base of €46.48 at 70% by the Assurance Maladie. The remainder is reimbursed according to your complementary health insurance.
There are no restrictive conditions to know about before consulting. It is during the consultation that we jointly assess your situation, I explain the applicable coverage to your case, and provide you with a complete and detailed quote — surgical fees, anaesthetic fees and facility fees included. No hidden costs. A mandatory legal reflection period of 15 days applies before signing.
Additional fees apply in sector 2. A detailed and transparent quote is provided at the consultation. No hidden costs.
During each consultation, I show you photographs of operative results — before and after — to allow you to visualise concretely what labiaplasty can bring. These photographs come from my practice and are presented to you in a strictly medical and confidential context.
This is an important moment in the consultation: it allows you to have realistic expectations, to understand the differences between the two techniques (direct resection and wedge), and to choose with full knowledge. No decision is taken on the day of the consultation — the legal reflection period is mandatory.
Intimate surgery is above all a surgery of trust. It requires careful listening, precise technical mastery, and support that respects the time each patient needs.
Dual board-certified in Gynaecology-Obstetrics and Surgical Oncology, trained at Institut Gustave Roussy, I perform this surgery as part of a comprehensive gynaecological practice — ensuring a coherent and safe anatomical and functional approach to the perineum.
Three main techniques coexist. The choice depends on morphology, the degree of pigmentation of the free edge, the presence of asymmetry, and the anatomical features the patient wishes to preserve (relief, colour, sensitivity).
| Technique | Principle | Best indication | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linear (edge) resection | Linear excision of the free edge | Moderate hypertrophy, pigmented free edge to remove | Simple technique, short learning curve | Long scar, loss of natural free edge |
| Wedge resection (Alter) | Central triangular excision, edge-to-edge sutures | Marked hypertrophy, desire to preserve the free edge | Preserves free edge, relief and pigmentation | Technically more demanding, rare risk of dehiscence |
| Composite resection | Combination wedge + linear or Y/V | Complex asymmetry, major hypertrophy or associated clitoral hood | Adaptable to highly variable morphologies | Tailored operative plan, longer duration |
| Local anaesthesia + sedation | Lidocaine + light IV sedation | Moderate hypertrophy, cooperative patient | Quick discharge, no strict fasting | More uncomfortable for some patients |
PrincipleLinear excision of the free edge
Best indicationModerate hypertrophy, pigmented free edge to remove
AdvantagesSimple technique, short learning curve
LimitationsLong scar, loss of natural free edge
PrincipleCentral triangular excision, edge-to-edge sutures
Best indicationMarked hypertrophy, desire to preserve the free edge
AdvantagesPreserves free edge, relief and pigmentation
LimitationsTechnically more demanding, rare risk of dehiscence
PrincipleCombination wedge + linear or Y/V
Best indicationComplex asymmetry, major hypertrophy or associated clitoral hood
AdvantagesAdaptable to highly variable morphologies
LimitationsTailored operative plan, longer duration
PrincipleLidocaine + light IV sedation
Best indicationModerate hypertrophy, cooperative patient
AdvantagesQuick discharge, no strict fasting
LimitationsMore uncomfortable for some patients
Sources: Alter GJ, Aesthet Surg J 2008; Goodman MP, J Sex Med 2016; CNGOF — Gynaecological surgery recommendations 2024.
The information on this page draws on peer-reviewed medical publications and the recommendations of learned societies (CNGOF, ACOG, ESGE).
This page is for information only and does not replace individualised medical consultation.
Consultations at the practice, 241 rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré (Paris 8th), and at Clinique Hartmann (Neuilly-sur-Seine). Surgery takes place at Clinique Hartmann.